Legal Opinion

State v. Grays Harbor Commercial Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923No. 17374PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

— The defendant was charged by amended information with the crime of having in its possession with intent to sell decomposed and contaminated food, the charging part of the information being as follows:

“That the above named defendant, Grays Harbor Commercial Company, during all times material -to this action has been and now is a corporation doing business in the state of Washington; that upon the 12th day of November, 1921, said defendant corporation did unlawfully have in its possession within said county and state, with intent to sell the same, certain *228impure and adulterated, decomposed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Merrill v. HodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. Valeri v. Pullman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Commonwealth v. WorcestrrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Brevoort Hotel Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ratigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Childs Dining Hall Co. v. SwinglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API