Legal Opinion

Lendholm v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1913No. 7892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District .Court. — Hon. Hubert L. Shattuck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Plaintiffs in error, defendants in the court below, were convicted of keeping open on Sunday a place in which spirituous, vinous, malt and other liquors were kept, sold, bartered, exchanged or given away, and of therein selling intoxicating liquors on said day, contrary to the provisions of Section 1805, R. S. 1908. They were sentenced to pay a fine, and bring the cause here for review.

The case was tried upon an agreed statement ol facts. Defendants were the officers and directors, and had actual charge and management of the Cafe Mozart, a “regular restaurant” conducted in the City and County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GibsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Hussey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Cardillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. City of Denver v. DomedianColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Harris v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Downes v. McClellanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Golden v. People ex rel. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API