Legal Opinion
Kirk v. City of Muskogee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1938No. 28351PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON. J.
The present appeal involves the alleged error of the trial court in sustaining the demurrer interposed on behalf of the defendant to the petition of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs, who are the • minor child and widow of one C. R. Kirk, deceased, filed this action to recover damages for his death, which occurred as a result of the collision of the automobile, in which he was riding, with another automobile at the intersection of K and Houston streets in the defendant' city.
The substance of the material allegations of the petition is as follows: That K street extends in a northerly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Dorminey v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mayor, Etc., of City of Vicksburg v. HarralsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
- Marth v. City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Parson v. Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Tolliver v. City of NewarkOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Avey v. City of West Paim BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.