Legal Opinion

Dorminey v. City of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1936No. 3 Div. 129PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The court below sustained the demurrer of the city of Montgomery to plaintiff’s amended dbmplaint, and the plaintiff, on account of this adverse ruling of the court, suffered a nonsuit, with an appeal on the record.

The demurrer filed by the defendant to the amended complaint takes the point that the installing and maintenance of traffic signal lights' by the city was the exercise of a governmental function, under its police power, with the view of regulating traffic at the points where the signals were installed, and to conserve the safety of the public making use of said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. City of Bessemer v. WhaleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Mayor of Savannah v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  5. City of Bessemer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Town of Fort Oglethorpe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. City of Mobile v. HavardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Parson v. Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Kirk v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API