Legal Opinion

Tolliver v. City of Newark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1945No. 30285PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The single question presented is whether the amended petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant.

It is universally agreed that at common law a municipal corporation is not liable for failure in the performance of governmental functions. However, for many years liability has been imposed upon municipalities of this state, in connection with the care, supervision and maintenance of streets.

Section 3714, General Code, reads as follows:

“Municipal corporations shall have special power to regulate the use of the streets, to be exercised in the manner…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Aldrich v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Auslander v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Dorminey v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Mayor, Etc., of City of Vicksburg v. HarralsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Parson v. Texas CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Rodgers v. RayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Williamson v. PavlovichOhio Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API