Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Tytenicz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1935No. 25711PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in which the defendant in error, plaintiff below, as a riparian owner, sues the city of Oklahoma City, plaintiff in error, defendant below, for temporary damage to 160 acres of land belonging to him, situated upon the North Canadian river, east of Oklahoma City.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff’s chief contention was that the defendant carelessly and negligently dumped its sewage and chemicals into the North Canadian river, which were carried by said river by and on the defendant’s property, and produced such a foul odor…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. August Berger v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Jones v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nichols Ex Rel. Kauk v. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Wilson v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kirk v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API