Legal Opinion

Farris v. County of Riverside

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 20, 2009No. Case CV 05-6166 AG (CTx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CONCERNING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

This case involves certain deputies’ claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Plaintiffs are sworn and un-sworn deputies (“Plaintiffs”) that work for Defendant County of Riverside (“Defendant”) and believe Defendant has deprived them of compensation due under the FLSA. More specifically, Plaintiffs claim that Defendant wrongfully denied them overtime compensation, or at least regular compensation, for work-related activities done before and after their shifts.

Defendant has filed four motions for partial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Nehmelman v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Perez v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Flores v. City of San GabrielDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Lasater v. DirecTV, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API