Legal Opinion

Lasater v. DirecTV, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 2, 2017No. Case No. 2:16-cv-01373-SVW-ASPublished

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN V. WILSON, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

*998I. Introduction

This case was filed in early 2016 and has now reached summary judgment. The individual Plaintiffs are scheduled for trials that span from November 2017 and into December 2017. DirecTV has claimed for years that the Installers it hires through Contracting Companies are independent contractors, not employees. The Installers claim that they are employees as a matter of law, and are eligible for various California and Fair Labor Standards Act statutory protections. Both parties ask this Court to determine the Installers' status as a matter of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API