Legal Opinion

Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1988No. 86-1951PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

The principles followed by this court in reviewing the BTA’s real property value determinations are stated in the syllabus in Cardinal Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 13, 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N.E. 2d 433, as follows:

“2. The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. * * *

' “3. The Board of Tax Appeals is vested with wide discretion in determining the weight to be given to evidence and the credibility of witnesses which come before the board. * * *

“4. The fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cleveland Public Library v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Dublin Senior Community Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. HealthSouth Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API