Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The principles followed by this court in reviewing the BTA’s real property value determinations are stated in the syllabus in Cardinal Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 13, 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N.E. 2d 433, as follows:
“2. The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. * * *
' “3. The Board of Tax Appeals is vested with wide discretion in determining the weight to be given to evidence and the credibility of witnesses which come before the board. * * *
“4. The fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Cleveland Public Library v. Cuyahoga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Woda Ivy Glen Ltd. Partnership v. Fayette County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Dublin Senior Community Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- HealthSouth Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.