State ex rel. Heimann v. George
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator states that the “complaint for writ of prohibition was filed in the Court of Appeals, because the Judge of the lower court made it clear that he intended to'procééd with the divorce * # *' [in]J"this matter * * *, even though there is still an appeal pending in the first case,” and contends that there is “no adequate remedy at law to‘ give redress', to [sic] the injury which appellant would receive, if the divorce decree were granted:”-.-.
However, this court has stated that “[t]he rule is firmly established that the Court of Common Pleas is a court of general jurisdiction and,. as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co. v. MayerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Albright v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.