Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1971No. 71-396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reason that the complaint for a writ of prohibition does not state a cause of action. Prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RuppertOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Heimann v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Shoop v. MitrovichOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API