Legal Opinion

Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1981No. 80-1569PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

Including the certified question, appellant raises six propositions of law for our consideration. In essence, these assignments of error present three basic questions: (1) Did the court of common pleas have jurisdiction over the forcible entry and detainer action; (2) did the court err in directing a verdict for appellee; and (3) did the court err in denying appellant’s motion for a continuance?

I

The first issue presented is one which has not been previously addressed by this court. Succinctly stated, the question is whether courts of common pleas have subject-matter jurisdiction over forcible…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ramey v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Bossert Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Heimann v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Southern Hotel Co. v. Miscott, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Wolfrum v. WolfrumOhio Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. McGraw v. GormanOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dumas v. Estate of DumasOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API