State ex rel. Albright v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
For a writ of prohibition to issue the respondent must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, the exercise of that power must be unauthorized by law, and refusal of the writ must result in injury for which no other adequate legal remedy exists. State, ex rel. Lewis, v. Warren Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1990), 52 Ohio St. 3d 249, 556 N.E. 2d 1184.
Respondents argue for dismissal on grounds that a common pleas court has authority to determine its own jurisdiction and appeal is an adequate remedy at law, citing State, ex rel. Mansfield Tel. Co., v. Mayer (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Department of Administrative Services v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Arbor Health Care Co. v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- State ex rel. Heimann v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Iris Sales Co. v. VoinovichOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- State ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co. v. MayerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Ohio High School Athletic Assn. v. Ruehlman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- City of Galion v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Ohio Council 8, AFL-CIO, Local No. 2243Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Perez v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Aust v. Ohio State Dental BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.