Legal Opinion

Canty v. Bockenstedt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1927No. 25,835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 212 N.W. 905. Respondent and his wife executed their note for $5,000 to H.J. Stiger and secured the note by a mortgage on 80 acres of land in Murray county. The parties to the transaction were residents of Iowa. Stiger assigned the note and mortgage to George E. Rickcords of Chicago, Illinois. Rickcords died testate and his Illinois executors assigned the note and mortgage to Adelaide E. Rickcords of Chicago. She in turn assigned them to Martin Mee, a resident of Iowa. All the assignments were duly recorded. Respondent defaulted in the payment of interest and taxes and early in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Jenness v. School District No. 31, Washington Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  3. Ahern v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Easton v. ChildsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Sward v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Briggs v. Kennedy Mayonnaise Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API