Jenness v. School District No. 31, Washington Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was brought in the District Court for Washington County, on a special contract for services as teacher; on the trial it appeared, that at the time the contract was made the plaintiff had not procured a certificate of qualification as teacher, as required by statute. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff removes the cause to this Court by appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Oowrt
Wilson, Oh. J.
On the 22d day of December, A. D. 1866, the board of trustees of said school district contracted with the plaintiff to teach a public school in the district for the term of three months, to commence on the 24th of December, 1866, and he did commence and teach the school, in accordance with the contract for the term agreed upon.
*449When the contract was made the plaintiff had not obtained the certificate of qualification required by statute, bat subsequently obtained such certificate, dated December 24th, 1866. Admitting that this certificate was made when it bears date,…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State v. KeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Leystrom v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hosmer v. Sheldon School District No. 2North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.