Martin v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Caroline L. Baldwin, from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Shaiv, J.,-without a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
. Gilfillan, C. J.
The action is under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate. The only controversy here is between plaintiff and the defendant Caroline L. Baldwin. So far as affects their adverse claims, the facts are: July 10, 1874, one Bell owned the real estate, and on that day conveyed it to Bufus J. Baldwin, husband of Caroline L., for the consideration of $4,400. Of this, $1,466.67 was paid by a credit of that amount upon the price of real estate about the same time conveyed by said Bufus J. to Bell, and the remainder of said $4,400 was secured by a mortgage executed by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Faribault v. MisenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Jackson ex dem. Lansing v. ChamberlainNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Jackson ex dem. Tuthill v. DuboisNew York Supreme Court · 1809
3Cited by12 opinions
- Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Hebden v. BinaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. StagebergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Canty v. BockenstedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lau v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.