Legal Opinion

Knowles v. Mulder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Bussell, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The parties to this suit are farmers and neighbors, living on adjoining sections of land, one in the township of Eavenna and the other in the township of Moorlahd, in Muskegon county. The defendant is the owner of a dog which had been in his possession upwards of two years. On August 7, 1887, the plaintiff was riding in a buggy drawn by one horse, past defendant’s house, in the public highway. His hired man was sitting in the seat with him,. and each was leading a colt by the halter behind the buggy. A third, colt was following loose behind them. The colts were two years old, had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newton v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Owen v. HampsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Groner v. HedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Nicholes v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API