Hood v. Hagler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
This case arises out of a dog bite incident which took place within the city limits of Oklahoma City. The incident occurred upon property belonging to Ernest Hagler, who allegedly owned one of the dogs involved in the attack. The other dog belonged to the defendant, Charles Musick, who leased a portion of the Hagler premises. Approximately a year prior to the incident, the plaintiff, Ms. Hood, had gone to the Musick residence to purchase some homegrown tomatoes from the Haglers. We would point out that the Haglers were not in the business of selling tomatoes, but had agreed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Frazier v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Baker v. First Nat. Bank of Santa RosaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Wood v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Hampton by and Through Hampton v. HammonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Goodwin v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.