Legal Opinion
Navarro v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2008No. 04-70324PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge Pregerson; Concurrence by Judge CLIFTON.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners Carlos Navarro and Belem Carolina Navarro (the “Navarros”) moved the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to reopen their deportation proceedings on the basis that they qualified for the benefits of the Barahona-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 243 F.Supp.2d 1029 (N.D.Cal.2002) (“Barahona-Gomez II”), class action settlement.1 That settlement allows certain eligible aliens to apply for suspension of deportation under the less stringent pre-Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Alfred Minasyan v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sergio Fajardo Sotelo Prisca Ramirez Aleman Yadira Betzave Fajardo Aleman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. SimmonsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Jordan v. Paul Financial, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Farchione Motors, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jose Martinez Rios v. John Mattos, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Molina v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.