Legal Opinion
Molina v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2009No. 03-74663Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jacqueline Molina (“Molina”) petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision finding her ineligible for benefits under the class action settlement in Barahona-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 243 F.Supp.2d 1029 (N.D.Cal.2002) (“Bara-hona-Gomez ”). The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, which we repeat here only to the extent necessary to explain our decision. We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination of eligibility for benefits under the Barahona-Gomez settlement, and review de novo. Sotelo v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 968, 970 (9th Cir.2005).
In a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jeffrey M. Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Dba Sam's Club, and Gary DawesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sergio Fajardo Sotelo Prisca Ramirez Aleman Yadira Betzave Fajardo Aleman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Barahona-Gomez v. AshcroftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Navarro v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008