Sergio Fajardo Sotelo Prisca Ramirez Aleman Yadira Betzave Fajardo Aleman v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their motion to reopen deportation proceedings. Their motion was made in an attempt to avail themselves of the class action settlement approved in Barahona-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 243 F.Supp.2d 1029 (N.D.Cal.2002). That settlement permitted eligible immigrants to apply for suspension of deportation under the law as it existed prior to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (1996), as amended by Pub.L. No. 104-302, 110 Stat. 3656 (1996).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Emmanuel Mejia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Barahona-Gomez v. AshcroftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Botefur v. City of Eagle Point, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by33 opinions
- Juan Larin-Ulloa v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- JURADOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Pelayo-Garcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sylvia Masnauskas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- ROBLESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.