Jordan v. Paul Financial, LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On May 15, 2009, the Court heard oral argument on defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. Having considered the arguments of the parties, the papers submitted, the authority submitted after oral argument, and for good cause shown, defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and plaintiffs motion is GRANTED…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. Central Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Jordan v. Paul Financial, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Rose, LLC v. Treasure Island, LLCCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2019
- ROSE, LLC VS. TREASURE ISLAND, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- ROSE, LLC VS. TREASURE ISLAND, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2019