Flanary v. Transport Trucking Stop
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Plaintiff’s tractor-trailer combination became difficult to steer and left the highway. The jury verdict awarded plaintiff damages, thus determining that defendants were negligent. Defendants appeal from the denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative, for a new trial. Defendants contend the motion for judgment nowithstand-ing should have been granted because (1) the evidence of negligence was insufficient and (2) the evidence of proximate cause was insufficient. They contend the motion for new trial should have been granted because…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Frei v. BrownleeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Dahl v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Garcia v. Barber's Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Naumburg v. WagnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- McCarson Ex Rel. Estate of McCarson v. ForemanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.