Legal Opinion

Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1967No. 8167PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

Panhandle Steel Erectors Company (hereafter termed Panhandle) and Joe G. Mysz-kowski, defendants below, have appealed from a $40,000 judgment for personal injuries suffered by Bennie Tapia, plaintiff below, entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

Tapia fell from a ladder and was injured while working as a welder on a building being constructed for the University of New Mexico. His employer, Underwood-Testman Company, was the project’s general contractor; Panhandle was a subcontractor; and defendant Myszkowski was Panhandle’s employee. There was testimony that 2x4 boards were…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Reed v. StyronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. McCauley v. RayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cave v. CaveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Jewell v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API