Naumburg v. Wagner
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals an adverse jury verdict concerning a Wagoneer-motorcycle collision. Three points are raised for reversal. We affirm.
Point I: “THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF JURORS DID NOT AGREE ON THE VERDICT AS REQUIRED BY N.M.S.A. 21-1-1(48) (b).”
The polling of the jury showed that eleven jurors found liability. The twelfth juror, Piatt, thought both plaintiff and defendant were negligent. Nevertheless, she went along with the vote assessing $30,-000.00 as damages. Two of those who had voted for liability did not agree on the assessment of damages. Whether their vote was for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Baros v. KazmierczwkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. HeislerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Stauffer v. KarabinColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Powell v. Norman Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.