Legal Opinion

Naumburg v. Wagner

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1970No. 369PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant appeals an adverse jury verdict concerning a Wagoneer-motorcycle collision. Three points are raised for reversal. We affirm.

Point I: “THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF JURORS DID NOT AGREE ON THE VERDICT AS REQUIRED BY N.M.S.A. 21-1-1(48) (b).”

The polling of the jury showed that eleven jurors found liability. The twelfth juror, Piatt, thought both plaintiff and defendant were negligent. Nevertheless, she went along with the vote assessing $30,-000.00 as damages. Two of those who had voted for liability did not agree on the assessment of damages. Whether their vote was for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Old Republic Insurance Company v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Baros v. KazmierczwkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. HeislerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Stauffer v. KarabinColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Powell v. Norman Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API