Legal Opinion

Barzellone v. Presley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 2005No. 102,427PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatt, C.J.

¶ 1 Three issues are presented on appeal. The first is whether the imposition of a jury fee violates the Okla. Const, art. 2, § 19 1 providing that the right to jury trial shall be and remain inviolate or the guarantee of access to courts found in the Okla. Const, art. 2, § 6. 2 If a jury fee is constitutionally permissible, we are asked whether the $349.00 fee provided by 28 O.S. Supp.2004 § 152.1(A)(7) 3 is excessive. Finally, we must determine whether the $349.00 jury fee imposed is refundable if no jury is called.

112 We determine that the collection of jury fees, which may be charged as a…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Brown v. PatelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Gilbert v. Security Finance Corp. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Gens v. Casady SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API