Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1990No. 1005-87PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

WHITE, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for driving while intoxicated. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed his punishment at thirty days’ confinement, probated for two years, a fine of $500, and suspension of appellant’s driver’s license for one year.

On direct appeal, appellant presented nine points of error. In the first, appellant argued that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence which was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 4. In the second, appellant also urged that the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Higbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Higbie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1998
  2. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  3. Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993
  4. State v. Wagner, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API