King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WHITE, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for driving while intoxicated. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed his punishment at thirty days’ confinement, probated for two years, a fine of $500, and suspension of appellant’s driver’s license for one year.
On direct appeal, appellant presented nine points of error. In the first, appellant argued that the trial court erroneously admitted evidence which was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 4. In the second, appellant also urged that the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Higbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Higbie v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ferrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1998
- Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993
- State v. Wagner, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.