Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 20, 2005No. 09-04-173 CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES KREGER, Justice.

Christopher Scott was convicted by a jury of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen years of age. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.021(a)(l)(A)(i), (2)(B) (Vernon Supp.2005). Scott was sentenced by the jury to fifty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Scott appeals raising three points of error.

In his first point, Scott argues the trial court committed reversible error by not allowing him to cross-examine the State’s witness, Steve Burney, as to his mental state. Burney is the father of J.P., the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Adanandus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Perry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  2. Torres v. DANNY'S SERVICE CO., LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
  3. Brandon Duane McDaniel Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021
  4. Glen Ramirez v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
  5. James Leslie Kesman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API