Legal Opinion
State v. Wagner
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 26, 1992No. 05-89-00675-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
CHAPMAN, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals the ruling of the trial court granting a motion to su-press. On original submission, the State presented one point of error contending that: (1) sobriety checkpoints are constitutional; (2) the trial court erred in holding that the DWI checkpoint violated the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, section 9 of the Texas Constitution; and (3) the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress. This Court overruled the point and remanded the case for trial. The Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Higbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. Kaufman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Olympic Waste Services v. City of Grand Saline, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Williams v. Kaufman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Gray v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.