Legal Opinion

King v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 16, 1991No. 05-86-00461-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BURNETT, Justice.

Michael Ray King appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). After a jury trial, the court assessed punishment at thirty days’ confinement, probated for two years, a $500 fine, and suspension of King’s driver’s license for one year. On original submission, King presented nine points of error. In his first point of error, King argued that the trial court erred when it overruled his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to an illegal traffic roadblock in violation of the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution. This Court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Higbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. State v. HubacekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Nieto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API