Visneski v. Visneski
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying an álternative motion for amended findings or a new trial. At the oral argument, it was agreed that the correct spelling of the name of the parties is “Visneski.” The title has been amended accordingly.
Plaintiff brought an action against defendant for divorce on the ground of desertion. The court found that on October 27, 1927, defendant wilfully and unlawfully deserted plaintiff, and granted him an absolute divorce. The parties were married at Bradford, Pennsylvania, on July 4, 1921. As issue of the marriage, there was one child, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gerard v. GerardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Van Cleve v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Graml v. GramlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Locksted v. LockstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Johnson v. FreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alldredge v. AlldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Albertson v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Molto v. MoltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.