Johnson v. Freid
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This is an action to recover $1,100 upon the constitutional double liability of the defendant as a stockholder to the extent of 11 shares in the U. S. I. Realty Company, á Minnesota corporation. There was a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial and appeals from the order denying his motion.
On January 29, 1926, the district court of Hennepin county, pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 8025, levied an assessment of 100 per cent upon the stock of all the stockholders of the U. S. I. Realty Company, of which the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Bartlett v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Webster v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Lebens v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Visneski v. VisneskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Johnson v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931