Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Freid

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1930No. 27,990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

This is an action to recover $1,100 upon the constitutional double liability of the defendant as a stockholder to the extent of 11 shares in the U. S. I. Realty Company, á Minnesota corporation. There was a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial and appeals from the order denying his motion.

On January 29, 1926, the district court of Hennepin county, pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 8025, levied an assessment of 100 per cent upon the stock of all the stockholders of the U. S. I. Realty Company, of which the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Bartlett v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Randall Printing Co. v. Sanitas Mineral Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Webster v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Lebens v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Visneski v. VisneskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Johnson v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API