Legal Opinion

Locksted v. Locksted

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1940No. 32,528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment in a divorce action.

Assailed is the jurisdictional allegation of residence. The argument is hypertechnical. While imperfect, the allegation is sufficient.

The complaint alleged cruel and inhuman treatment. To this, charges, countercharges, and denials were directed. Testimony adduced was in nearly complete conflict. The entire record has been read, but no purpose would be served by reciting the evidence. Whether there was cruel and inhuman treatment was a fact issue pivoted on credibility. In determining this appeal, it must be remembered that if a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. CraysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Lamprey v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Graml v. GramlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Rhoads v. RhoadsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Sollar v. SollarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Albertson v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Gerard v. GerardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Visneski v. VisneskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API