Graml v. Graml
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, G. J.
Defendant has appealed from a judgment awarding the j)laintiff a divorce.
Appellant bases his appeal upon the claim that the evidence is insufficient to sIioav Avilful desertion on his part and bases the argument upon the doctrine of Taylor v. Taylor, 177 Minn. 428, 225 N. W. 287.
We are unable to agree AArith the contentions of the appellant.
We have been troubled Avith one question not presented or discussed in the briefs but which has developed in the course of our consideration of the case.
G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9905, provides that “divorces shall not be granted on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Lundy v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Parmly v. ParmlyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Ewald v. HuftonIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Hines v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Louden v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Albertson v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Gerard v. GerardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Visneski v. VisneskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.