Legal Opinion

Barbee v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The demurrer to the jurisdiction is interposed upon the ground that the proper remedy for “contesting the validity of an election” is a proceeding by information in the nature of a quo warranto, brought by the Attorney-General of the State, C. S., 870, or by a private relator with leave of the Attorney-General, O. S., 871. Cooper v. Crisco, 201 N. C., 739, 161 S. E., 310. In support of tbis position, the defendants rely chiefly upon the decisions in Saunders v. Gatling, 81 N. C., 298, and Britt v. Bd. Canvassers, 172 N. C., 797, 90 S. E., 1005. The authorities cited are inapposite. The…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Jones v. Commissioners of Person CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Wood v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Woodall v. Western Wake Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Murphy v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. State Education Assistance AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Britt v. . Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Starbuck v. Town of HavelockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State Ex rel.Swaringen v. PoplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API