Bailey v. State
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
In this appeal class plaintiffs challenge the validity under the North Carolina Constitution of a repealed tax exemption for vested participants in state and local government retirement plans. We do not reach the constitutional issue because plaintiffs failed to comply with N.C.G.S. § 105-267, under which an arguably invalid tax can be challenged and remedial action taken. We therefore hold plaintiffs’ claims for a refund of taxes collected because of *232the repealed exemption and for an injunction prohibiting the collection of such taxes should have been dismissed.
I
Like…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Stone v. ErrecartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.