Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1991No. 105PA91PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

In this appeal class plaintiffs challenge the validity under the North Carolina Constitution of a repealed tax exemption for vested participants in state and local government retirement plans. We do not reach the constitutional issue because plaintiffs failed to comply with N.C.G.S. § 105-267, under which an arguably invalid tax can be challenged and remedial action taken. We therefore hold plaintiffs’ claims for a refund of taxes collected because of *232the repealed exemption and for an injunction prohibiting the collection of such taxes should have been dismissed.

I

Like…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stone v. ErrecartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API