Legal Opinion

State Ex rel.Swaringen v. Poplin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

The question for decision is : Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? We think so.

The defendant contends that under the law it is the duty of the county board of elections to judicially determine the result of the election from the report and tabulation made by the precinct officials. That the unsuccessful candidate must pursue his statutory remedy, citing N. C. Code, sections 5923, 5927, 5933, and especially C. S., 5923 (15), which reads as follows: “It shall be the duty of the State Board of Elections: (15) ‘To have the general supervision over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbee v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Gower v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Bouldin v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Harkrader v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burgin v. North Carolina State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Cmty. Success Initiative v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  3. Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  4. Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Harper v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API