Emerson v. ADULT COMMUNITY TOTAL SERVICES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, plaintiffs have filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s previous decision entered January 6, 1994, granting summary judgment on behalf of the defendants, 842 F.Supp. 152. Because plaintiffs have done nothing more than disagree with this court, and have failed to demonstrate an error of law, we must deny plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.
On February 22, 1990, Kenneth Emerson, at the age of 83, entered into a resident agreement with defendant Adult Community Total Services (AC.T.S.),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Reich v. ComptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Chemic (US), Inc. v. Fine Grinding Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Huls America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Dippold v. Laurel of DuBois, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1998