Legal Opinion
Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan Zlotnicki
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 23, 1986No. 85-5149PublishedCited by 792 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
Harsco Corporation initiated an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against Lucjan Zlotnicki, a former employee, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment as to the ownership of an invention conceived and developed by Zlotnicki during his employment with Harsco. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Harsco and denied Zlotnicki’s motion for reconsideration. Zlotnicki appeals and we affirm. 1
I,
The following undisputed facts are set out in Harsco’s statement of material facts in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by792 opinions
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
787 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.