Legal Opinion
Reich v. Compton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 1, 1993No. Civ. A. 88-7920PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is the motion of plaintiff the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (“the Secretary”) for reconsideration of my July 21, 1993 order, 834 F.Supp. 743, entering judgment against plaintiff and in favor of defendants on plaintiffs claims alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., by Local Union No. 98 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Pension Plan (“the Plan”) fiduciaries Fred Compton (“Compton”), Joseph McHugh (“McHugh”), John Neilson (“Neil-son”),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Cutaiar v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Dodge v. Susquehanna UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1441, Pens. Plan Guide P 23909g Robert B. Reich, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Fred Compton, Joseph McHugh John Nielsen, Frederick Hammerschmidt, Gersil N. Kay, Electrical Mechanics Association, the Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- United States v. JasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.