Legal Opinion

New Chemic (US), Inc. v. Fine Grinding Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1996No. Civil Action 96-3605PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

Before this Court is the Motion of New Chemic, Inc. (“New Chemic”), for Reconsideration of this Court’s Order of August 21, 1996, granting Defendant’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and, thus, dismissing with prejudice the negligence claim set forth in Count II of Plaintiffs Complaint. Because New Chemic believes that this Court’s Order was erroneous, it now moves for reconsideration under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(g). Alternatively, New Chemic requests that it be granted leave to amend its Complaint to address any deficiencies…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. REM Coal Co., Inc. v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Dodge v. Susquehanna UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Villanueva-Mendez v. Nieves VazquezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
  3. Factory Market, Inc. v. Schuller International Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. FojaniniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Federico v. Charterers Mut. Assur. Ass'n Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API