Miner v. Dabney-Johnson Oil Corp.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This cause was transferred to this court after decision by the District Court of Appeal. We are in full accord with the conclusion reached by the District Court of Appeal regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment and agree with that court “that the case presents a substantial conflict in the evidence”. We question, however, the correctness of the determination of that court that the trial court so seriously erred in its instructions to the jury as to compel a reversal of the judgment.
The first instruction to which the appellants object is as follows: “You are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brooks v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- McChristian v. PopkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. ClemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.