Hume v. Conduitt
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
It is alleged in the appellants’ complaint that Lavina Hume, as surety, and Oliver E. Hume, as principal, executed to Conduitt, Cook & Co. their promissory note; that, at the time said note was executed and continuously since, the said Lavina was and has been a married woman; that an action was commenced on said note before a justice of the peace ; that the said justice, notwithstanding the fact that no summons had been served on the appellants, or either of them, made the following entry upon his docket: “March 30th, 1874, summons returned served by reading; John Richardson, const.and that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Muncey v. JoestIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Miller v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.