Kuntz v. Sumption
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
The board of equalization of Randolph county entered an order reading thus: “ On motion, the board increased the assessment of Peter Kuntz on personal property twenty thousand dollars.” Prior to the meeting of the board Kuntz had listed his property for taxation. He was subpoenaed before the board, and testified as a witness, but did so under protest.
We have given to the principal question in this case much and careful study, and we are compelled to hold that the statutory provisions concerning the authority of the county board of equalization to increase the valuation of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Macklot v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Weaver v. TemplinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.