Legal Opinion

M. Itzkowitz & Sons, Inc. v. Santorelli

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 15, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff brought this action of replevin to recover certain sewing machines and equipment to which it claimed the right of possession under a conditional bill of sale to Beckley Needlecraft, Inc. The named defendant is a deputy sheriff for Fairfield County who held the property under a writ of attachment issued on behalf of the Park City Binding Company, Inc., the other defendant. An answer denying the allegations of the complaint and containing nine special defenses was filed, but it will be necessary to consider only two of the issues raised: (1) That no default existed under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phalen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  2. Gest v. GestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Chapin v. PeaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  4. Tator v. ValdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Huntington v. ShermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. AtterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Cornelio v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. D'Addario v. AbbottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Staub v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Rhode Island Hospital National Bank of Providence v. LarsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API