Huntington v. Sherman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
REPLEVIN for a quantity of tools; brought to the Court of Common Pleas for Litchfield County, and tried to the court before Rorahaeh, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLoomis, J.
This is an action of replevin to recover the possession of certain personal property, consisting of tools and machines used by the defendant in his business as tin-ner, and particularly described in the complaint. The facts found by the trial court, so far as they are material to our present discussion, are as follows:—
The plaintiffs were partners in business in the town of Woodbury, and as such partners were the owners of a certain shop building there. The defendant leased the shop from the plaintiffs and occupied it as a tinner’s shop. The implements and chattels mentioned in the writ of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nevan v. RoupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Keiser v. ToppingIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by5 opinions
- M. Itzkowitz & Sons, Inc. v. SantorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- People's State Bank v. Jacksonian Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Peoples Bank of Buffalo v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- McGarvey v. PrinceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Minge & Co. v. Barrett Bros. Shipping Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1914