Legal Opinion

Staub v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 22, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in his favor in an action of replevin for possession of an automobile and for damages after a new trial limited to that issue in accordance with the direction of this court in Staub v. Anderson, 151 Conn. 384, 198 A.2d 207. The defendant had unlawfully obtained and retained possession and use of the plaintiff’s car from November 22, 1960, until it was replevied on May 18, 1961.

The plaintiff waived any claim for loss of use but claimed that he was entitled to the depreciation in the value of his car from the time of taking to the date of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ralph N. Blakeslee Co. v. RigoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. M. Itzkowitz & Sons, Inc. v. SantorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. Staub v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ATC Partnership v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Cornelio v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Faulkner v. Marineland, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. Atc Partnership v. Town of Windham, No. Cv 950049838s (Sep. 19, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  5. John Deere Co. v. Presidential Homes, No. 31 16 58 (Feb. 20, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API