Legal Opinion

Bryant-Durham Electric Co. v. Durham County Hospital Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1979No. 7814SC534PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

In 1972 when the parties entered into the construction contract, arbitration was governed by Chapter 1, Article 45 of the General Statutes. This article provided that a controversy had to exist between the parties in order for them to make a binding contract for arbitration. Skinner v. Gaither Corporation, 234 N.C. 385, 67 S.E. 2d 267 (1951). The controversy in this case did not arise until after 2 June 1972. The provision for arbitration in the contract of that date is not binding.

The movant contends that the parties entered into an agreement for arbitration by correspondence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varley v. Tarrytown Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Carver v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Skinner v. Gaither Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re Mercury Construction Corporation, Mercury Construction Corporation v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  3. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Lost Creek Municipal Utility District v. Travis Industrial Painters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API