Legal Opinion

Burkhead v. Farlow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1966No. 604PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The informal “Option of Purchase” signed by defendants, the parties sought to be charged in this action, embodies the terms of the offer of sale and the names of the vendor and vendee. The adequacy of the description of the land to be conveyed is not in question here, for defendants admit in their further answer that on August 15, 1961, they executed an option to plaintiff to purchase the lands described in the complaint. See Lane v. Coe, 262 N.C. 8, 136 S.E. 2d 269; Gilbert v. Wright, 195 N.C. 165, 141 S.E. 577; Norton v. Smith, 179 N.C. 553, 103 S.E. 14. This case, therefore, involves no…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Warner v. W & O, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Thomason v. . BescherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Richardson v. Greensboro Warehouse & Storage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Katz v. Pratt Street Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Karas v. BroganOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Karakehian v. BoyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Dixon v. KinserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API