Legal Opinion

Tucker v. ADG, INC.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 2004No. 98,895PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

[1 The issue in the present cause is whether the trial court erred in entering judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendants/Appellees in accordance with Hull v. Oklahoma City Baseball Co., 1945 OK 194, 163 P.2d 982, which held a spectator seated in an unscreened portion of a grandstand at a baseball game assumes all normal or ordinary risks attendant upon the use of the premises. Plaintiffs/Appellants seek the overruling of Hull in the instant appeal. We hold that the trial court correctly entered judgment as a matter of law in favor of Defendants in this case and we further hold that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Copeland v. Lodge Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Storm v. NSL ROCKLAND PLACE, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API